FW-42 Maiden

It’s been a while since I built the FW-42 back in January.

http://blog.smfc.co.uk/2014/01/no-plan-no-clue-my-fw-42/

And finally we got a nice day which wasn’t howling a gale although it wasn’t as calm as I would have preferred.

It all started so well…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk_l8hmn-hU

But then went down hill quickly apparently stalling and spinning out of control! I have a feeling that it may even have just been a badly placed centre of gravity, and moving more weight forward may have created better results.

Duelling Streamer Nickers

A classic duel of good verses evil, White and Red VS Black and Green fought over 2 rounds

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GD5Fd7_joTA

(The forward and backward cameras appear to have a little different frame rate so they are in sync somewhere in the middle of the film)

A lesson to be learned from the Black and Green plane here…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71LdOR9rq5E

Don’t hold the streamer near the elevator servo when launching, it obscures your view a little šŸ˜‰

 

Round 2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Uqgpho0nxI

And from the evil black and green planes rear view we see a bit more this time…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ro88Y3leEZw

Can’t believe black and green threw in the towel and dropped it’s streamer when it was winning! lol

 

3…2…1… Launch!

First test launch of the rocket glider.

3…2…1…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVycHil999A

OK, the wind has moved round a bit, so move round, change the angle of launch, change the position of the rocket motor slightly on the glider.

3…2…1…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJm2YH2K2K8

Hmmm, still needs a little something.

Almost an Automatic Ban (How High, How Far, How Fast 2)

As we all know being caught over 100mph is an automatic ban. Fortunately whilst speed testing Scott’s newly decorated Viggen EDF we clocked a top speed of 96 mph. A technical issue with the launch mechanism which caused damage to the nose, and shifting of the battery possibly over the GPS unit so it didn’t detect correct meant that although we think this speed was beaten it was not correctly measured.

The first run had an on board camera, and here is the GPS track

speed1

 

And the onboard for run 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruRFUOC4Anw

Below is the speed vs altitude for each of the runs, as you can see run 4 does not appear to show correct data.

 

SpeedVsAlt

Adding onto this I did do some further calculations based on the longitude and latitude registered on the device, although the speed was not logged, the position appears to have been. Below is the graph which show this calculation appears to be very close to the measured speed, although the calculated speed does not take account of vertical speed, only horizontal speed.

CalculatedSpeed

This show a top speed of 126 MPH!Ā Although of course if the speed isn’t being logged correctly, the altitude does look like it is not being logged correctly here, so the position is also not confirmable. But as an unofficial top speed 126mph isn’t bad!

 

Updated:

Based on the same calculation of distance moved between each recorded point, the points are always 1 second apart, so the distance travelled can be calculated and so then of course the speed

otherruns

How High? How Far? How Fast?

Something I think we all wonder is how high our plane goes, how fast they go, and its rather difficult to know exactly how far away it gets when its up in the air.

I purchased a GPS tracker (well 2 and lost the first one) to get a better idea of these three questions. Today I put the GPS tracker in a glider and a camera on it. Of course gliders tend to be flown at altitude so I didn’t think a ground video would be much use.

So lets start with the flight. This was made from a glider, I’m not great with a glider anyway, and they say a bad workman blames his tools, fortunately I know I’m a bad workman. So this is how not to do gliding. I definitely had trouble with this glider under power it seems to roll and pitch quite violently and I have a lot of issues correcting this as you will tell from this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABFsLl16G1o

So onto the questions, the first question is how high:

elevation1

This is the elevation track of the flight against the distance traveled over ground. The ground level is showing as 340ft and the maximum altitude of 1204ft (at approx 84 seconds into the flight) at this altitude I was now having problems seeing the orientation of the glider, and particularly since I find the glider rather unstable under power I decided it best to stop at this height. So this makes the maximum altitude 864ft above the ground.

This leads onto the how far. As you can see the total flight distance is 2.1 miles in a total flight time of 355 seconds (just under 6 minutes). The actual how far away it goes can be seen on this track of the flight.

glider2track

Although I didn’t try to fly very far away the track shows that the perception of the distance away when flying you think that your plane is far further away than it actually is. I expected to be more than the next field away, this shows that I barely made it out of our field.

The final question was how fast. The top speed on this track was actually 48.5 mph, I have created a graph of speed, height and overlaying the 2 graphs

altitude-speed

I dont know if it shows up great, but as you would expect the top speed is when the glider is in a steep dive at 235 seconds into the flight, at the end of a dive when the glider went from just over 600ft (recorded, not above ground) to just under 500ft in about 6 seconds. The speed is of course very volatile with a glider since the wind was fast enough to be able to bring the glider to a halt in the air with the wind speed keeping air flowing over the wings. As you will notice I’m not very good at it so my glider only appears to stop or come close to stationary on 3 occasions other than take off and landing.

 

Mr Mel is a far better glider pilot than I can hope to be. He has agreed to his tracks and onboard also be added to this post. Although the onboard and the gps track does not relate to the same flight, you can see many better flight characteristics over my fight. Firstly here is the onboard:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW-nahPrCVw

As you can see the flight is far smoother than mine, although Mel is still quite critical of how much the glider actually stalls. It show how difficult it can be to fly a glider perfectly when the glider is 500+ft up in the air.

The elevation and the gps track show a much straighter, more uniform climb, he holds position much better in the areas he is getting lift, you can also see this from the speed track which show he is stationary far more often. Perhaps Mr Mel could do a guide to good and bad gliding?

 

20140219090302-31027-profile

glider1-track

glider1-graphs

Although not ground breaking I hope that you found this as interesting as I did.

No Plan — No Clue — My FW-42

Recently Scott pointed me at ‘Printed Warbirds’ in that list was theĀ Focke-Wulf FW-42.

Focke-Wulf FW-42A fantastic looking plane that looks like it is something out of the wacky races and I was a little surprised thatĀ  Scott hadn’t noticed and already started building it. So with a bit of persuasion I decided to have a go.

 

 

I couldn’t find any plans for the plane, but I did manage to find a sheet with the 3 views, front, top and side already blown up to a 48″ wing span. So I downloaded, printed and tiled it up on the dinning room table.

20140114_182333r

I thought the lovely square body lent itself perfectly to foamboard and flitetest’s method of folding fuselages rather than depron, and the main wing with the engines attached would need quite a lot of carbon reenforcing if made out of depron, but made into an aerofoil shape with foamboard could probably quite nicely support the weight and stress. Also the 2 motors should be able to give the model enough muscle to lift the heavier foamboard into the sky. And I’ve still got a few boards of foamboard left, so foamboard it is.

Unfortunately my tiled image is rather low resolution, so I put a piece of board under the plan and started by using a pencil to go round the outline of 1 wing, this produced a light dent in the foamboard which I then made into a better shaped wing, added the extra underside so it couldĀ  be folded into a aerofoil shape and cut it out. Because the plan was so low resolution if I did the same for the other wing they would never match so I flipped this wing over and made a new trace of it for the other wing. The spars were next. On the plan the wing is very tapered almost to a point, although I dont think I can quite get this, I did make a tapered spar to try to mirror this, but still leaving just enough room for the aileron servo in the wing void.

20140114_182507r

I didn’t want to glue this up yet because I am still not sure how this will go onto the fuselage, or how the engines will connect to it.

So the next step is the canard. Initially I was going to make this a KF step but thought that was a bit of a cop out after making the main wing as an aerofoil. So I decided to make this an aerofoil shape also. I also wanted to make this out of 1 piece so used a piece of paper to trace round the front canard on the plan with the intention of folding it and cutting it out to produce the full wing template.

20140114_195829r

Then after I added the underside of the wing I realised that because of the shape of the wing, and the direction of the folds (not perpendicular to the body centre line) the base of the wing would need to be in 1 piece and the top would need to be separated and come together when folded, so I cut this 1 sided paper template out and traced round it twice to create my front canard wing.

20140115_210006r

20140115_210054r

I also initially wanted to put the elevators on this canard but the placement of the servo and the connecting of the pushrods eluded me. I did want to put it out of the bottom of the plane since the base of the plane was such a nice square shape, putting a servo inside the body with a connecting rod to each side of the canard would be almost impossible to thread and connected. Putting 1 servo on 1 side with a bit of bent wire to make each elevator work together was an option but would create a rather lob sided look. The best option I could come up with is 2 servos, 1 either side each connected to each elevator, but this would mean there a 2 servos right at the front putting extra weight and extra complexity. So although the elevators are marked they are not cut and the plane for the moment is going to be going forwards with Elevons and the hope that I can get the plane balanced enough for these to give enough control. But that might change yet…

Next I turned to the engine mountings, These will need to fit over the wing and key into the wing for strength. So to try to make sure I get the right shapes, and location for keys to avoid the spar I made a little paper mock up

20140115_222150r

A bit of shaping and fitting and it fits to the wing nicely, perhaps needs shortening a bit so it fits just the flat underside of the wing and doesn’t trail onto the tailing angled edge of the top side

20140115_222135r

Marked up where the keys should go on the paper and then a quick check with the motor placed in front of it to see if they are somewhere about the right size pointing forwards from the wing. The sheet was traced from the main plans because it is easier to move a single A4 sheet than the whole big sheet.

20140116_074913r

It looks about the right length, maybe even a little bit short to the scale but not too bad.Ā  I think that will do, I am still wary of putting too much weight too far forwards on this model. Once I transfer to foamboard I will try to bend up the underside to a nice curve by removing the inside paper and put a top on the box which will hopefully taper into the wing. Although this of course needs to happen after the wing has been pushed through the main body.

The main body is a nice simple shape, effectivly 2 boxes, a larger to the back and smaller to the front, although the plans do show that the body behind the main wing is narrower than the main body in front of the main wing. Since I dont have the plans of how this reduces I have discounted this and created a standard box for this section.

20140118_172441r

So now with all the pieces are cut we are ready to start assembly. The plans show the bottom of the canard wing is level with the baseline of the body, I am going to bring this up slightly so as to put a 5 degree inclination on it and add strength. The main wing also appears to come through the top of the main body, again this I think I will need to put so the main body remains in tact above it for strength.

20140119_083232r

More updates to follow…

Next update:

I’ve created the torque bar by bending up a single piece of wire with a loop in the middle to put a z bent piece to the servo, as suggested by Mr Mel. Here is the piece sat on the plane:

20140125_153404r

I did initially think of putting the wire in a hearing aid tube were it come through the bodywork so that it can be glued and not impede the movement of the elevators, but this didn’t work very well so I removed these tubes. Here is the canard, servo and mechanism all in place and working with the torque bar stuck to the elevators with epoxy glue.

20140126_123813r

I wanted to now fold up the engine nacelles and do a quick check of the receiver, speed controller and both motors to ensure that they reacted the way I expected. With the 2 speed controllers, 1 BEC had to be disabled by cutting the red wire from one of them. Everything checked out, both motors work fine, so I’m happy with that setup.

20140126_171226r

The next step was to put the wires through the main wing for the motors and the elevon servos, then join the 2 sides of the wing. To get a good fit I sanded these then hot glued them together. Passed it through the body, I used the plans to line up the wing and glued it into place

20140129_073626r

So the nacelles go onto the wing and the servos connected to the control surfaces

20140129_223042r

Now with the engines in place and held I could do a power test of the engines. The first prop I tried was a 6×4.5 triple blade prop (as shown above) this would be an ideal size since it clears the ground so the plane could belly land. On test these drew 11 amps each on a 3 cell battery, about 125watts each. This would give total power of 250watts. The weight of the model now was about 900grams, still with some work to do, so the estimated dry weight of the plane would be about 1kg (2 pounds) with an extra 500grams (1 pound) of batteries so 3 pounds all up weight, 250 watts would be a little under power. So I also had 2 triple blade 7×3.5 props. Surprisingly under test this developed even less power about 8 amps or 90 watts each definitely no good. So my triple blade 8×4.5 was next. This drew around 17amps, 180watts per motor this is still within the motors rating, but with a total power of 360watts this should give a reasonable power level for a 3 pound model, its not going to be acrobatic, but should lift it into the air nicely. So the 8×4.5 props it was. This did give another problem that the plane now could not be a belly lander, the prop does stick out rather too much and would be likely to do some damage to either the props or even the plane on landing. So I had to make some landing gear. The rear wheels where quite simple, making them in the same way as flitetest created the landing gear for the FT Cruiser attaching them to the engine nacelles. The front wheel was a little more of a problem, this was what I came up with

20140201_150330r

Hot gluing a piece of plywood on the bottom of the plane and bending a loop of wire through the wheel, retaining it with an elastic band to give it a little play. This now nicely lifts the whole plane up above the level of the propeller touching the ground.Ā Although I haven’t yet put the vertical tail fin on, the COG is currently towards the front of the main wing, using this calculator online: http://adamone.rchomepage.com/cg_canard.htm it should be about half an inch in front of the main wing. So placing the batteries in the main body ahead of the wing should move this to the correct place. So I created a hatch in the top of the main body for this, put a bit of velcro in to stop the battery moving around and a magnetic catch to keep it closed.

The final step is to put the vertical tail fin and hook it up to the servo and receiver

20140201_152900r

All looking good and ready for its test flight, final dry weight is exactly 1Kg, with 2 1400mah batteries the all up weight is just under 1300 grams. This maiden may not be this week, although the ground is nice and soft it is supposed to be a little windy tomorrow. So I will need to upload details of the maiden when I pluck up courage to do it. You never know I might even decorate it….

Dusters maiden and Prop Selection

I recently finished the FT Duster, I’ll not go into the build since the video on Flite Test goes through the build so much better.

http://flitetest.com/articles/ft-duster-build

The maiden flight could have gone much better:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4SJHfTz_IA

I reduced the throws slightly and increased the expo a little more, reduced the size of the battery I used from a 2200mah to a 1400mah 3 cell. At Mels suggestion I also removed the cab. All this moved the COG slightly back so it is on the back side of the spar in the wing.

I don’t have a video of this, but this made it a much easier plane to fly, still a little twitchy and under powered but much better.

So I then decided to pick a better prop I had a few to choose from:

20140101_120047r

from left to right an 8×4.5 triple blade, a 6×4, and 8×4 which was on duster for its maiden, an 8×6 orange, and 8×6 black and a 9×5 orange prop.Ā I then setup Duster with an amp meter and anchored it through a set of scales to give some idea of the thrust generated:

20140101_114247r

Although the measurement of the trust is by no means perfect it should give some idea of how good each prop is. The motor that is in duster is a 1580kv motor with a 20amp 14.8volt maximum power rating, so I have installed a 30amp hobbyking speed controller. I will be running it on a 3 cell (11.1 volt). The results of the current draw and trust measured is shown in the table below:

Prop Max Current (amps) Max Thrust (grams)
6×4 10 Did not register
8×4 16.5 220
8x6Orange 23 250
8x6Black 25 320
8×4.5 Triple 27 520
9×5 27 320

Apparently a plane flying through the air will take approximately 10% less current than the same plane static on the ground (due to the air movement over the prop, so I have found on the internet). Based on these numbers, although I think that the 8×6 black and orange trust figures are skewed by the setup, but I would say that the best prop would either be an 8×5 of the black type or the 8×6 orange prop, giving the maximum thrust with closest to the maximum power of the motor, and running it on a 3 cell should give the extra allowance to mean that it will take the current tested without burning out. The triple or the 9×5 prop would give more trust, but are both too far above the motors maximum working load current.

Jas39 Unbox and Maiden

I was lucky enough to be bought a new plane for Christmas, Starmax’s version of the Saab Jas39 Gripen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_JAS_39_Gripen).

The model was nicely boxed, easy to unpack and put together. It came with 3 servos preinstalled for the elevons and the rudder. It also came with the speed controller and a ‘custom’ EDF unit.

20131226_085947r

20131226_090221r

To complete the build was simple. Stick the wings, canards, tail vertical stabilizer, nose cone and canopy, although the tube of glue which came with the model was completely empty. The control horns where then screwed into place and the addition of the control rods, which was already fed through the fuselage for the rudder and just needed attaching an trimming to length. The battery hatch is quite small, only large enough for a 1300mah 3 cell battery, the AR400 radio fitted nicely in a cavity just behind the battery compartment, and aside from the water slide transfers it was ready for its maiden flight.

20131229_111647r

I was lucky to have some help hand launching it for its first flight (also the camera woman). The first flight needed quite a bit of trimming out, once it was trimmed it glides fantastically.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4nv8Y-eM60

The second flight was even better now it is trimmed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3ncacY1a1M

As with most EDFs it does struggle a bit on take off until it gets a bit of airspeed, I think it will benefit from a bungee launch, so have put a hook on the bottom of it, just in time for the bungee cord breaking. We shall see how much difference this will make.

But all in all, very happy, Really easy to put together, once going it seems to have enough power to get some reasonable speed (although its not the fastest plane), flies well at speed and doesn’t stall easily, and glides brilliantly.